Procyona
Зарегистрирован: 09.09.2012
Сообщения: 1876
Откуда: Finland
|
 Добавлено: 30.11.2013, 21:59 Заголовок сообщения: |
 |
|
| nmrt писал(а): | | Procyona писал(а): | | talent is based on time - it is the set of skills you have already learned |
Milla, correct?
I think we are out of sync with terminology. 
You interpret skills as talent, which some define as opposites.
| Цитата: | | An aptitude is a component of a competency to do a certain kind of work at a certain level, which can also be considered "talent". Aptitudes may be physical or mental. Aptitude is not knowledge, understanding, learned or acquired abilities (skills) or attitude. The innate nature of aptitude is in contrast to achievement, which represents knowledge or ability that is gained. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aptitude |
Yes, nice to meet you Artem
Thank you for the notion, I may have jumped to conclusions too quickly. It's nice that we can converce about the matter this deep
But I still think that talent is based on something we have learned - if not skills then competence. When doing some thing for the first time, we are using the competence we have learned when we are learning and using skills. Lets say I have a competence for playing guitar. If I at some time point play piano, I use the same musical competence there, and playing a piece is easier.
_________________
"As you think, so shall you become." - Bruce Lee
"Have fun, do good, and the money will come." - Richard Branson
"Believe in yourself. Keep writing." - Neil Gaiman |
|
RSS
